Screener
NEAR vs HYDB
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- NEAR costs 0.10% less per year.
- NEAR follows a active selection strategy; HYDB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYDB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NEAR | HYDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2013 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 7.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | 3.82% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -21.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NEAR and HYDB
Explore further