Screener
NFEB vs CCOR
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- NFEB costs 0.50% less per year.
- NFEB is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $28M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | -5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and CCOR
Explore further