Screener
NFEB vs CGBL
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.46% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while CGBL is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 9.69% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -11.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and CGBL
Explore further