Screener
NFEB vs CGMU
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.52% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -4.10% |
Similar to NFEB and CGMU
Explore further