Screener
NFEB vs CORB
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs AB Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CORB costs 0.51% less per year.
- CORB is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while CORB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; CORB uses active selection.
- CORB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | CORB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $999M |
| Since | 2025 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -3.08% |
Similar to NFEB and CORB
Explore further