Screener
NFEB vs GTO
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.44% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while GTO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- GTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -20.75% |
Similar to NFEB and GTO
Explore further