Screener
NFEB vs IMCG
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IMCG costs 0.73% less per year.
- IMCG is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while IMCG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; IMCG uses index tracking.
- IMCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 15.51% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -35.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and IMCG
Explore further