Screener
NFEB vs ILCG
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - February vs iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Key differences
- ILCG costs 0.75% less per year.
- ILCG is significantly larger than NFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NFEB is classified as alternative, while ILCG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; ILCG uses index tracking.
- ILCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NFEB | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.35% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -13.27% | -35.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NFEB and ILCG
Explore further