Screener
NLR vs URNM
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF vs Sprott Uranium Miners Etf
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, NLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NLR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NLR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $2.4B |
| Since | 2007 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.0% | +63.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.8% | +27.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.9% | +15.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.97% | 52.23% |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -50.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NLR and URNM
Explore further