Screener
NLR vs URA
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF vs Global X Uranium ETF
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.17% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NLR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $7.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 3.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.0% | +81.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.8% | +40.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.9% | +22.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.97% | 50.83% |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -61.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NLR and URA
Explore further