Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

NMAY vs NAPR

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May vs Innovator ETFs Trust

NMAY

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May

Innovator ETFs

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$14M

NAPR

Innovator ETFs Trust

Innovator ETFs

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$216M

Key differences

  • NAPR is significantly larger than NMAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • NAPR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

NMAYNAPR
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$14M$216M
Since20252020
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+15.9%+20.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+13.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+10.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.10
Volatility 1Y4.64%4.06%
Max drawdown-1.71%-16.53%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to NMAY and NAPR