Screener
NMB vs CMF
Simplify National Muni Bond ETF vs iShares California Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- CMF costs 0.44% less per year.
- CMF is significantly larger than NMB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NMB follows a active selection strategy; CMF uses index tracking.
- CMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NMB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46M | $4.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | 2.96% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.0% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.41% | 2.81% |
| Max drawdown | -13.69% | -14.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NMB and CMF
Explore further