Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

NOCT vs NMAY

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May

NOCT

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October

Innovator ETFs

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$237M

NMAY

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May

Innovator ETFs

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$14M

Key differences

  • NOCT is significantly larger than NMAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • NOCT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

NOCTNMAY
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$237M$14M
Since20192025
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+19.5%+15.9%
CAGR 3Y+15.4%N/A
CAGR 5Y+10.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.24N/A
Volatility 1Y7.65%4.64%
Max drawdown-16.21%-1.71%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to NOCT and NMAY