Screener
NPFE vs ACES
NPF Core Equity ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- NPFE costs 0.15% less per year.
- NPFE is significantly larger than ACES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NPFE follows a active selection strategy; ACES uses index tracking.
- ACES has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NPFE | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $127M |
| Since | 2026 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +71.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -0.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 32.22% |
| Max drawdown | -5.38% | -79.05% |
Similar to NPFE and ACES
Explore further