Screener
NTSI vs AGZD
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund vs WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
Key differences
- NTSI is significantly larger than AGZD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NTSI is classified as mixed asset, while AGZD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NTSI covers global markets; AGZD covers north america.
- NTSI follows a active selection strategy; AGZD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, NTSI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGZD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NTSI | AGZD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $486M | $92M |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.60% | 4.02% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.4% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.02% | 3.13% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -8.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NTSI and AGZD
Explore further