Screener
NTSI vs MEMA
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
NTSI is a mixed asset ETF, while MEMA is an alternative ETF. NTSI charges 0.26% a year and MEMA 0.85%.
- NTSI is a mixed asset fund, while MEMA is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- NTSI follows a active selection strategy; MEMA uses long short.
- NTSI covers global markets excluding the US; MEMA covers emerging markets.
- NTSI costs 0.59% less per year.
- NTSI is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| NTSI | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $500M | $13M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.50% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.53% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -13.12% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.