Screener
NULG vs ACSG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- NULG costs 0.23% less per year.
- NULG is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NULG follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
- NULG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NULG | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $15M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.01% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.17% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NULG and ACSG
Explore further