Screener
OACP vs CGCP
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF vs Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
Key differences
- CGCP costs 0.40% less per year.
- CGCP is significantly larger than OACP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OACP covers north america markets; CGCP covers global.
- OACP follows a index tracking strategy; CGCP uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OACP | CGCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.74% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.58% | 3.74% |
| Max drawdown | -11.81% | -15.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OACP and CGCP
Explore further