Screener
OACP vs CGCB
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF vs Capital Group Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGCB costs 0.47% less per year.
- CGCB is significantly larger than OACP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OACP follows a index tracking strategy; CGCB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OACP | CGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.74% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 4.23% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.58% | 3.99% |
| Max drawdown | -11.81% | -5.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OACP and CGCB
Explore further