Screener
OACP vs EYEG
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF vs AB Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- EYEG costs 0.44% less per year.
- OACP is significantly larger than EYEG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OACP is classified as fixed income, while EYEG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- OACP follows a index tracking strategy; EYEG uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| OACP | EYEG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.74% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $26M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 4.98% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.58% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -11.81% | -4.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OACP and EYEG
Explore further