Screener
OACP vs CORB
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF vs AB Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CORB costs 0.46% less per year.
- CORB is significantly larger than OACP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OACP follows a index tracking strategy; CORB uses active selection.
- CORB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OACP | CORB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.74% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $999M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 4.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.58% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.81% | -3.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OACP and CORB
Explore further