Screener
OAEM vs GUSE
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF vs Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- GUSE costs 0.95% less per year.
- GUSE is significantly larger than OAEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OAEM covers emerging markets markets; GUSE covers north america.
- OAEM follows a index tracking strategy; GUSE uses active selection.
- GUSE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OAEM | GUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.25% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $341M |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | 0.65% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.18% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.05% | -8.54% |
Similar to OAEM and GUSE
Explore further