Screener
OAIM vs GUSE
OneAscent International Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- GUSE costs 0.65% less per year.
- OAIM follows a index tracking strategy; GUSE uses active selection.
- GUSE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OAIM | GUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $344M | $341M |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 0.65% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.74% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.69% | -8.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OAIM and GUSE
Explore further