Screener
OALC vs CCOR
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- OALC costs 0.80% less per year.
- OALC is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OALC is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- OALC follows a index tracking strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, OALC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OALC | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $220M | $28M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.7% | -5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.05% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OALC and CCOR
Explore further