Screener
OASC vs DFAS
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- DFAS costs 0.43% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; DFAS uses active selection.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | DFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $14.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 16.95% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -26.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and DFAS
Explore further