Screener
OASC vs DFVX
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
Key differences
- DFVX costs 0.50% less per year.
- DFVX is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; DFVX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | DFVX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $486M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 10.93% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and DFVX
Explore further