Screener
OASC vs FDG
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.24% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; FDG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $387M |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +32.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and FDG
Explore further