Screener
OASC vs FLV
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FLV costs 0.27% less per year.
- FLV is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; FLV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | FLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $347M |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 10.08% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -15.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and FLV
Explore further