Screener
OASC vs IWD
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.51% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $74.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +30.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 10.90% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -38.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and IWD
Explore further