Screener
OMFL vs BELT
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- OMFL costs 0.46% less per year.
- OMFL is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while BELT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; BELT uses index enhanced.
- OMFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | BELT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $9M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.5% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -23.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and BELT
Explore further