Screener
OMFL vs CCOR
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
Both OMFL and CCOR are alternative ETFs. OMFL charges 0.29% a year and CCOR 1.29%. The main difference: OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- OMFL costs 1.00% less per year.
- OMFL is much larger than CCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, OMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $27M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | -3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | -1.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.38% | 7.22% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -22.99% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.