Screener
OMFL vs IWB
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
OMFL is an alternative ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. OMFL charges 0.29% a year and IWB 0.15%.
- OMFL is an alternative fund, while IWB is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- IWB costs 0.14% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than OMFL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $48.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.38% | 12.39% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -34.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.