Screener
OMFL vs PEPS
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Parametric Equity Plus ETF
Key differences
Both OMFL and PEPS are alternative ETFs. OMFL charges 0.29% a year and PEPS 0.10%. The main difference: OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; PEPS uses option income.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; PEPS uses option income.
- PEPS costs 0.19% less per year.
- OMFL is much larger than PEPS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | PEPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $28M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.38% | 13.61% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -9.79% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.