Screener
OMFL vs SPHD
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while SPHD is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; SPHD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPHD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | SPHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.0% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 11.06% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -41.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and SPHD
Explore further