Screener
OMFS vs DEEF
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- DEEF costs 0.15% less per year.
- OMFS is significantly larger than DEEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFS covers north america markets; DEEF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, DEEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | DEEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $55M |
| Since | 2017 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 3.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +25.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.63% | 13.59% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -36.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and DEEF
Explore further