Skip to content
Screener

OMFS vs DYNF

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$283M

DYNF

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

Annual cost

0.26%

Fund size

$36.7B

Key differences

Both OMFS and DYNF are equity ETFs. OMFS charges 0.39% a year and DYNF 0.26%. The main difference: OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; DYNF uses active selection.

  • OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; DYNF uses active selection.
  • DYNF costs 0.13% less per year.
  • DYNF is much larger than OMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, DYNF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

OMFSDYNF
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.26%
Fund size (AUM)$283M$36.7B
Since20172019
Dividend yield0.90%0.89%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedactive selection
CAGR 1Y+26.4%+24.4%
CAGR 3Y+14.6%+24.6%
CAGR 5Y+5.5%+14.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.591.25
Volatility 1Y17.81%12.87%
Max drawdown-42.50%-34.72%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to OMFS and DYNF