Screener
OMFS vs RFV
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; RFV uses index tracking.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $313M |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 18.26% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and RFV
Explore further