Screener
OMFS vs RPV
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RPV is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; RPV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 12.76% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -50.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and RPV
Explore further