Screener
OMFS vs SPLV
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- SPLV costs 0.14% less per year.
- SPLV is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; SPLV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $7.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and SPLV
Explore further