Screener
OMFS vs XMLV
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.14% less per year.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; XMLV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $750M |
| Since | 2017 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +6.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 10.33% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and XMLV
Explore further