Screener
ONEV vs RSMV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF vs Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF
Key differences
- ONEV costs 0.75% less per year.
- ONEV is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ONEV is classified as alternative, while RSMV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ONEV follows a multi strategy strategy; RSMV uses active selection.
- ONEV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONEV | RSMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $501M | $29M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 0.99% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.35% | 11.84% |
| Max drawdown | -39.72% | -17.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ONEV and RSMV
Explore further