Screener
RSMV vs SPLV
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- SPLV costs 0.70% less per year.
- SPLV is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; SPLV uses index tracking.
- SPLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $7.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and SPLV
Explore further