Skip to content
Screener

ONLN vs RWM

ProShares Online Retail ETF vs ProShares Short Russell2000

ONLN

ProShares Online Retail ETF

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$66M

RWM

ProShares Short Russell2000

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$119M

Key differences

Both ONLN and RWM are equity ETFs. ONLN charges 0.58% a year and RWM 0.95%. The main difference: ONLN follows a index tracking strategy; RWM uses inverse.

  • ONLN follows a index tracking strategy; RWM uses inverse.
  • ONLN covers global markets; RWM covers North America.
  • ONLN costs 0.37% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, ONLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ONLNRWM
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$66M$119M
Since20182007
Dividend yield0.33%4.16%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackinginverse
CAGR 1Y+7.4%-25.3%
CAGR 3Y+22.0%-12.8%
CAGR 5Y-6.5%-4.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.76-0.70
Volatility 1Y23.81%19.45%
Max drawdown-71.77%-73.72%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ONLN and RWM