Screener
ONOF vs XNAV
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- ONOF costs 0.88% less per year.
- ONOF is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ONOF is classified as mixed asset, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONOF | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $31M |
| Since | 2021 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.43% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -26.21% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ONOF and XNAV
Explore further