Screener
OPER vs SCHO
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF vs Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHO costs 0.17% less per year.
- SCHO is significantly larger than OPER — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OPER follows a active selection strategy; SCHO uses index tracking.
- SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPER | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $12.5B |
| Since | 2018 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 4.10% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.6% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.26 | 0.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.26% | 1.38% |
| Max drawdown | -2.33% | -5.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPER and SCHO
Explore further