Screener
OPER vs SCHQ
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.17% less per year.
- SCHQ is significantly larger than OPER — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OPER follows a active selection strategy; SCHQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OPER has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPER | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $897M |
| Since | 2018 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.10% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.6% | -0.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | -4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.26 | -0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.26% | 9.08% |
| Max drawdown | -2.33% | -46.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPER and SCHQ
Explore further