Screener
OPTZ vs IWM
Optimize Strategy Index ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.06% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than OPTZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPTZ | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.6% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.13% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -25.75% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPTZ and IWM
Explore further