Screener
OPTZ vs OMFL
Optimize Strategy Index ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFL is significantly larger than OPTZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OPTZ is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- OPTZ follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- OMFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPTZ | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +54.9% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.03% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -25.75% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPTZ and OMFL
Explore further