Screener
OPTZ vs RWK
Optimize Strategy Index ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- OPTZ costs 0.14% less per year.
- RWK is significantly larger than OPTZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| OPTZ | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.6% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.13% | 16.91% |
| Max drawdown | -25.75% | -46.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OPTZ and RWK
Explore further