Screener
ORBX vs XFLX
Global X Space Tech ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- ORBX costs 0.47% less per year.
- XFLX is significantly larger than ORBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ORBX is classified as equity, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- ORBX follows a index tracking strategy; XFLX uses active selection.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ORBX | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $49M |
| Since | 2026 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.73% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.53% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ORBX and XFLX
Explore further